This is a continuation of Stephenson’s rants against me, after I left the BTP:

Todd:
“Really? What kinds of things, other than brag about your radio show
and host them on a shitty server that’s had loads of problems with
keeping hosts and their guests on the air? How many listeners for
every broadcast you’ve made? How many listeners for your
re-broadcasts? And none of that
“Well-a-lot-of-them-came-from-IPR-and-Last-Free-Voice” crap, ok? We
can do without that.”

I just stated what kinds of things. And every statement you just made
about my radio network is a huge exageration or an outright lie.
Seriously Todd, your radio show was just a nowlive channel. Nothing
glamorous about that. I don’t keep track of over all listeners but the
podcasts usually get to thousands eventually.

Todd:
“but the bullshit “let’s-dodge-questions-and-fuck-with-his-mind”
claptrap is pathetic and down-right mush. It’s boring.”

Basically everything here applies to you. But I would say that it’s
not really boring anymore to watch you make a complete idiot of yourself.

Todd:
“But then, what else can we say about a hack who’s only been an
At-Large Member of the BTP for almost three months and, despite voting
on a few measures on the NatComm, has nothing to show for it.”

You are so grasping for straws. Still pathetic. Todd what exactly am I
supposed to have to show for it? There has not been much going on
lately. I don’t think anyone on the commitee has anything signifigant
to “show for it” over the last few months. I suppose your record of
getting people to leave the party and utterly fumbling the Florida
affiliate, and trying to use the Michigan affiliate in your “personal
feud” is what you have to “show for it”.

Todd:
“Really? Prove it. Give us the names of the people with whom you
spoke. Did you ever give them the website address? Did you give Jim’s
name, email address, and phone number for them to talk to him? Did you
get them to sign up as members of the BTP?”

Yes I did give them the website address. It is utterly ludicrous of
you to think that I have to prove every person I talked to at the
various voter events and door to door I did. Seriously, absolutely
silly. Once again, pathetically grasping for straws here Todd.

Todd:
“Oh, and about your campaign run, Neil, how many people did you have
on your staff? Who was your campaign manager? How many mentions did
you get in the Detroit Free Press? The News? MLive.com? USA Today? The
New York Times? The Washington Post? Other than a guy you hired to do
webmastering duties, how many people volunteered their time, energy,
money, and effort for your campaign?:

Not sure how any of this is in any way releveant exactly. More Todd
grasping for straws.

I was interviewed on AM and FM radio. I was interviewed for the
Detroit Free Press and a few of the county newspapers. I attended
every voter forum I was invited to. As for who worked for me and why I
don’t really see the point? Who cares? My web staffer volunteered, I
had someone who was my driver. That’s really all I needed.

Todd:
“I only saw that one debate you had (in Port Huron, I believe it was;
could be mistaken), and that was a really lame-ass, cheesy debate
which had no substance whatsoever.”

Todd, your such a liar. Seriously you were excited about that debate
before. But now because I am not on your cool list you decide to say
that it was “lame” and “without substance”. Why don’t you go publish a
poem in your High School newspaper about how lame and without
substance it was. Maybe then someone just might care about your opinion.

Todd:
“If the BTP’s name was “exposed to thousands of Ron Paul
Libertarians,” how come I haven’t seen a gigantic increase in party
membership? How many of them VOTED for you? If those “thousands” of
Paul supporters were “exposed” to the “theocratic Constitution Party,”
how come we don’t have those thousands signed up as members of the
national BTP and the Michigan BTP?

The majority of Ron Paul Libertarians have either went to the
Constitution Party, or the Republican party. As for how many of them
voted for me, you seem to like asking absurd questions that there is
no way to know the answer to. I had about 5k votes when the tallies
were done, and I came in ahead of the Green Party candidate. That was
enough for me. Still grasping for straws Todd. Just acknowledge that
your pathetic and go away. Please.

Todd:
“If any of your claims were true, we would have seen thousands of
emails from those supporters. They may have heard about the BTP (maybe
from the likes of you), but they didn’t bother to sign up for a free
account on the Party’s website or even on the Facebook group.”

Would this be anything like the thousands of members that Jim claims
to be responsible for bringing to the party who for some reason never
vote on anything?

It is very possible that they looked at us and didn’t have any further
interest at this time. We are a much smaller party. And if any of them
have looked recently at your drivel it wouldn’t surprise me if they
saw it and wanted nothing to do with the party. Oh wait, we already
know they do that.

Note: (I am not even responding to some of the drivel that came after
that. But moving on.)

Todd:
“As an out-of-the-closet anarchist (you can have the word
“libertarian,” Neil!), I have no desire to run for office at any point
in the future or anytime soon, nor do I have any desire to apply for
any government-paid congressional staffer or intern position. I have
nothing to lose on that account, but you sure as hell do.”

Thanks for saving us all some serious embarrassment. I for one feel a
lot better knowing that you will never be running for office, because
someone might trace back that you were at one time a member of this
party. And I would have to play damage control explaining that because
we are a party for personal freedom that includes personal freedom for
pathetic losers too. I have nothing to “lose” either Todd. I ran for
office because I wanted to spread the message. Nothing more.

Todd:
“Boy, you’ve got me all wrong and completely-ass backwards. That’s not
a new thing for you, “Eric,” but yes, it sure is a hoot though.
I didn’t respond to you because of me thinking “I did all this great
stuff in the movement.” I responded to you because I have shitloads of
more experience in the movement than you do. I’ve got approximately 10
years ahead of you in this movement. You’re just a fucking wanna-be
libertarian and a newbie. And the way you respond to my posts makes
you a pussy, boy!! Oh, sure, yeah, “Eric,” you’re a tough bad boy. Oh
yeah, you know how to fight with your words and not your fists.”

UH OH! Are you threatening me Todd? UH OH!

Seriously. I can just get out the popcorn and watch as you tear down
any credibility you ever had. Your expirience in the context of you
being pathetic in human interaction means absolutely nothing. And that
is the point. You can be an expirienced asshole and still be an
asshole. But I am sure your poem in the school newspaper is counted in
your countless years of expirience that you have over me.

Todd, you don’t live that far from me if you want to find out if I
know how to fight with something other then words. So if your threat
is genuine, come on over. “Pussy boy”.

The vast majority of what follows is really lame childish stuff that
doesn’t even warrant a response. I will however make another comment.

“I was never a Gravel fan and never cared for him.”

Another one of those “fair weather lies” from Todd Barnett. On your
OWN SHOW you said that Mike Gravel would of been a good choice for the
party. Pathetic.

Todd:
“You do them a great disservice by ignoring them and take all the
credit, which is you implied in your above-mentioned crack.”

Wow…. just when I think you could not become more pathetic. You
continue to surprise me Todd. My above crack consisted of me saying “I
helped organize the Revolution March.” Not “I take credit for it” or
“I did all the work.” YOU LIED. AGAIN! Pathetic little delusional toadie.

Once again wading through useless crap.

Todd:
“I never said I was better than you, Neil.”

That is what your whole post was trying to say Todd. And you failed.
Miserably.

Todd:
“That implies that I have a superiority complex, which I don’t.”

Don’t recall using that wording. But I do think your an insecure,
immature little toad.

Todd:
“George Donnelly, your pal,”

Another lie. I don’t even know who that is. If he was in the chat room
agreeing with me that is total happenstance. What is not happenstance
is that there was no shortage of people who thought you were a useless
whiny crybaby.

Todd:
“People, I think Neil has a sexual crush on me. I think he harbors gay
tendencies towards me..and maybe Mike Gravel himself. LOL LOL LOL!!
Dude, you should try Prozac! I’ve been on that before, and it’s great!
As for Gravel, who cares about him? He’s worthless to me. I wouldn’t
even shine his shoes, even if he awarded me a nice, fat stipend to go
with it.”

I am so happy that a “prominent party member” like Todd Barnett feels
that it is appropriate to insinuate that other members are gay. And
also feels that it is appropriate to insult people on the basis of
them being gay. This is absolutely a positive thing for the party.

I am so glad you resigned from the party Todd. Seriously. I didn’t
seek it, but statements like the one above prove it beyond a shadow of
a doubt. Aside from all of the childish garbage that I didn’t even
bother quoting and responding to, this really takes the cake. Great
move for freedom.

By the way, being in an indie film does not suddenly validate you.

Todd:
“Yes, you have no proof that I’m lying. The burden of proof isn’t on
me; it’s on you.”

And further from Todd:

“What lies have I spread Neil?”

Todd, you and Jim both had a laundry list of invented conspiracy
theories and absolute nonsense about how I was plotting to destroy the
party, along with a host of other garbage. You still lie constantly.
Like that I have never posted anything for liberty on any website,
etc. The burden of proof was never on you when you made this absurd
allegations. But now you expect me to prove that you were lying about
things that you totally made up? Seriously Todd. Their is no evidence
other then your own words, posted here on this website. Where you and
Jim went about deluding yourselves into believing that just because I
don’t like you I must be out to destroy my party.

You invented a “band” of people I am supposedly trying to take over
the party with.

You insinuated that my involvement with the LP was somehow sinister,
even though Tom Knapp is running for that same party’s nomination.

The list of absolute fiction you tried to spread about me goes on, and
on and on. Pathetic.

As to
A. (In reference to the Justin TV chat) Nothing I did in any way in
that chat room justifies you taking it upon yourself to remove me from
anything. Period. Or putting me on in some kind of trial basis. The
fact that you thought that the Michigan affiliate was ever even
something noteworthy enough for it to matter that you “removed” me
from it points to your delusional nature even further. I didn’t
“conspire” with anyone Todd. You really flatter yourself. I didn’t
even know those people. They all just had something in common, a
hatred of you, and of Jim Davidson. I hate to tell you this Todd, but
your in no way signifigant enough to justify having “conspiracies”
against.

From Todd:
” B.) Inquired about those standards after I did “un-resign” myself
only to see that you would be removed from your position because you
were derelict in your duties as my vice chair and subsequently as my
At-Large Member,”

This is a lie Todd. You made it very clear that you were only removing
me because of your personal feud with me. You stated that in plain
language on Bostontea.us. We discussed me moving to at large member
from Vice chair, but there was not much in the way of “duties” to
speak of for me to be derelict of, as vice chair or an at large
member. I know you would like to try and lie your way out of the fact
that you were motivated by nothing other then unprofessional childish
garbage, but it’s a little late now Todd. Everyone read what you
posted on Bostontea.us, and it exposed you. The fact that you are
trying to lie and cover it up now further proves how pathetic you are.
(Note: Nevermind the fact that you can’t just “remove me”. How very
authoritarian of you.)

“I’m no longer the chair of that party, as my old Vice Chair has
assumed control of the Party;”

Thank the Gods.

Todd:
“C.) Moved to delete blogs from the BTP website, largely in part due
to your dissatisfaction with Jim and your war with him”

It had nothing to do with that. It had everything to do with the fact
that Jim Davidson’s statements on the main site were being taken as
statements by the whole party. Including statements that were being
taken as believing that every American soldier was murdering children
and raping women. I settled for a disclaimer. As that whole incident
proved whether Mr. Davidson intended that meaning or not, it was being
stated that he spoke for our whole party because of those blogs. I
stand by this action. You have lied about my motivations. Again. Big
surprise.

Todd:
“D.) Moved for a disclaimer on the website, which Tom intelligently
shot down and put up a disclaimer, only because you whined and bitched
about what members in the blogs say.”

Todd, your reading comprehension clearly needs help. Maybe when you
were publishing poems in the High School newspaper you would of
learned a thing or two. Tom didn’t “shoot down” the disclaimer. He put
it up without a motion because he agreed to it. Moron.

Todd:
“E.) Harassed me in private, even though I published your venom here
on the talk list”

So this whole thing started with Jim Davidson refusing to stop
harassing me in private email. He stops emailing me, then starts
launching his campaign to make our private problems the whole party’s
business. Then out of the blue, he starts emailing me again, and then
posting the replies claiming that I was emailing him first. Citing
harassment.

Todd then engaged in this same tactic. I suddenly get an email from
him out of the blue asking me not to email him anymore. Even though I
had never emailed him at all. I responded by telling him not to email
me to get me stop emailing him when I hadn’t been emailing him. He
then started posting the replies claiming that I was contacting him,
when every email he posted was a reply to something HE HAD SENT ME.
Todd, your lies and your delusions know no bounds. If you didn’t want
another email from me, you should of got the hint when I pointed out
to you that I had not been emailing you, and that you should stop
emailing me if you didn’t want a reply.

Seriously man. Pathetic.

Todd:
“F.) Dissed the BTP on IPR and several other blogs, even though you
remain an At-Large Member of the Party”

Nope. Just dissed you and Jim. Not the whole party. Not even a
signifigant part of the party. Just you and Jim. I know you think you
are the whole party and all, but your not. I explained earlier what my
“dis” was, and how it was not an attack on the BTP at all. Nice try
though. Keep lying, maybe eventually at least you will believe
yourself… if you don’t already.

Todd:
“G.) Called for moving the meetings to a conference-call-only format
(which would mean party members would have to sit through over an
hour’s worth of recorded discussions on the phone in order to maintain
transparency and openness, which you openly opposed),”

I never opposed transparency and openness. This is the absolute lie by
Jim Davidson that started all of this.

Todd:
“despite the fact that you didn’t bother to notice that the national
bylaws require the Committee’s deliberations to be open and transparent.”

There is nothing that is not transparent about a conference call
broadcasted live, with archives available. It would ADD to the
expirience because you could listen to the tone of voice and sincerity
of the words of the people speaking. Doug even suggested that he would
like to do it once or twice a year after the fact. Todd, you are once
again proving to be a delusional liar.

Todd:
“Only those people, with the exception of the Seebecks, told me how
they felt about me, and it proved to me that they weren’t Libertarians
at all.”

For someone who earlier accused me of being a person who thinks he can
decide who is and is not Libertarian. These people are somehow not
Libertarian just because they like most smart people I know think your
an idiot. You have attacked my own Libertarianism on no grounds
whatsoever other then the fact that I don’t like you.

Already covered the “threatening Jim” stuff.

I would still like to point out that Jim also felt I was threatening
to have my mother beat him up.

Todd:
“As usual, regarding my privately-recorded chat with Jay (which I
destroyed once and for all), you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Seriously, dude. You don’t.”

Ok, please enlighten us? I would be very happy to hear you explain
away why you recorded a private conversation and then spread it to
different members in the party? Seriously. Pathetic.

Todd:
“You should be fucking grateful that Jim didn’t call the fucking
authorities on you, let alone sue your ass for libel. He would have
easily built a huge-ass case against you. If you made a statement like
that against some other Joe, I doubt he would have been so forgiving.
Fuck, we gave you a free pass on that one, man.”

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH! Seriously, bring it on. The depths of
your stupidity know no bounds. You GROSSLY overestimate how much
anyone would ever give a damn about this.

Todd:
“If Lin was wrong about what she “did” to you, Neil, then why is she
still with Matt Harris, the Chair of the Libertarian Party of West
Virginia? Why is she still hanging out with him? LOL Oh wait, isn’t he
your best friend too?? Good gosh!!! LOL!”

Todd, this is once again an example of you being utterly ignorant of
the truth. She doesn’t live in West Virginia. Is not with Matt
Harriss, and hasn’t been for months. (In fact, she has been living
with me for months now.) Matt and I a